GovernWith Blog

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) have been words ever present when talking about organisational culture and workforce, particularly in the last year. In Australian organisations, initiatives for DEI aim to guarantee representation and inclusive treatment of diverse workforces. These efforts strive against discrimination linked to race, gender, age, sexuality, and other minorities. Australian companies are increasingly embedding DEI into their operational frameworks by adopting detailed policies, conducting training programs, and collaborating with a variety of community groups. This approach is fostering a more inclusive corporate environment nationwide, but what about for our boards? 
 
Celebrating its tenth year, the Board Diversity Index* stands as the exclusive in-depth analysis of Australian boards. It surveys the top 300 ASX listed companies, focusing on gender, cultural background, age, skills/experience, tenure, and independence. While providing no data in relation to the not-for-profit space, we could assume the findings wouldn’t be too dissimilar. 
 
Though there has been some progress, especially in the number of board positions held by women, in many areas there has been no progress made at all, if not a decline. 
 
The average age of a Board Member is still over 60 with a rapid current wane in directors under 50, there is no data on directors who are disabled, racial diversity remains under 10% with even less representation of First Nations Peoples, and the LGBTQIA+ Community had 4 openly identified directors total. 
 
These findings are staggering. In Australia 42% of people who identify as LGBTQIA+* hide their identity at work and community events, 1 in 5 people in Australia have a disability*, 30.7% of the Australian population were born overseas*. When asking the question of their stakeholders, “Do they see themselves represented within our Board and Executive?”, many organisations simply need to answer no.  
 
Corporate, sector and professional skills are fundamental when it comes to looking at a board’s capabilities and being assured the members reflect a make-up of people with strategic oversight in all required responsibilities. When viewing this through a contemporary governance lens - a diverse range of lived experiences, community engagement and societal perspectives are also, unequivocally, essential. 

The Boardroom Bystander Effect

Coming out of the 2023 GovernWith Contemporary Governance Risks Whitepaper, there was an interesting phenomenon we saw trending through the data. The data collected had more than 2,000 individual contributions across both the Board Governance Review and the Director Skills Matrix. These two assessments meet two different criteria and require different “context hats” worn when completing them. The Board Governance Review is answered by an individual’s gauge, or evaluation, of how assured the board is that the whole organisation (board and executive included) are delivering on their Corporate, Sector Specific and Contemporary Governance roles and responsibilities. The Director Skills Matrix is answered by an individual considering their own understanding, qualifications and experience in relation to their Sector, Professional and Contemporary skills, measuring their level of capability.
 
While not entirely reflective of the psychological definition “an individual being less likely to help a person in need while in the presence of others”, the core message that bystanders often assume someone else will step in, is what we want to highlight. 

The diffusion of responsibility, particularly in contemporary governance issues, was demonstrated when comparing an individual’s view of the organisation’s capacity overall - often being quite positive, yet individually most in these same areas indicated their own capabilities were foundational. This emphasises, and gives evidence to, an attitude of pluralistic ignorance where boards may not have the ability to recognise or ask the right questions around trends and issues, if each of them is expecting another to have the educated knowledge and experience to be the voice in those areas.  
 
If a board has reflected in the Governance Review that the organisation are highly proficient in a particular area, but the group results of the individual skills matrix indicate most directors are foundational in their own capabilities - these results don’t align and give urgency to the risks and impact of bystander thinking. 

What a fantastic opportunity we have through this data in how we can individually reflect and respond. Shown through centuries of evolution and human behaviour we witness the ultimate benefits of being altruistic, curious and community serving. It’s up to each of us to make having an educated foundation for our thinking important, and to show initiative in seeking out that self development. These human centric trends and issues we see at the forefront of governance now are everybody’s responsibility. For a board, executive and whole organisation to be its most capable and sustainable, every member needs to be a participator in their ongoing development, training and preparation in contributing to these conversations. In 2024 our goal at GovernWith is to ignite and support proactive participation, leaving bystander apathy behind in 2023. 

In our increasingly interconnected world, the importance of socially responsible and sustainable business practices is gaining more attention than ever before.

We have had close to 1000 Directors complete our Board Governance Review and Director Skills Matrix. The results around ESG continually indicate a need for development in the awareness and capabilities of those at the Boardroom table, to contribute and think strategically in this area.

When prompting further discussion, the most common question is "What on earth is ESG?". 

What is ESG?

ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance trends and issues. The handprints (Social) and the footprints (Environmental) of an organisation. 

Environmental indicators look at how a company performs in the sustainability of our natural world. It may include waste management, energy use, consumerism, climate change mitigation and handling of extreme events. 

Social indicators examine how a company manages relationships with its stakeholders: employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities, through its operations. They may look at issues such as workforce (retention and HR practices), cybersecurity, social inclusion and diversity, modern slavery, minority groups, gender equity, First Nations people and community development. 

Australia is no stranger to the growing importance of ESG. 

The country’s exposure to environmental risks, such as covid, bushfires and floods has amplified the need for organisations to consider environmental factors in their strategic planning.

Australia’s social issues, including the reconciliation with its First Nations people and ever growing cyber hacking crime, also play into the policies and strategies seen more and more by those at the boardroom table.  

Why is ESG important for boards and organisations? 
 
Risk Management: Being aware of, and understanding ESG trends and issues help companies identify potential risks that may arise from environmental damage, social issues, and poor governance. By proactively, strategically addressing these factors, organisations can mitigate these risks and secure their long-term sustainability. 

Workforce: Understanding that staff are key stakeholders of an organisation and therefore, representing their voice, diversity, gender equity and inclusion is crucial. This starts at a board level. Reducing churn, increasing retention and building a strong work place culture, the handprint of an organisation is most strongly reflected through prioritising the voice of its staff, and its ability in not only implementing but encompassing ESG principles.
 
Investor Appeal: There is a growing trend of investors favouring businesses that uphold ESG principles. Companies demonstrating strategy, process and mission statements around these principles can potentially attract more investment, boosting their success.  
 
Regulatory Compliance: With an increasing focus on sustainability, governments worldwide, including Australia, are introducing more stringent regulations related to environmental protection, social issues, and governance. By adopting ESG principles, organisations can ensure they stay ahead of regulatory changes and avoid penalties. Coming into 2024 we are seeing an increase in these mandatory requirements such as Climate Change and Modern Slavery.
 
Reputation and Stakeholder Engagement: Companies known for their commitment to ESG principles enhance their reputation, which lead to increased consumer loyalty, better relationships with stakeholders - including workforce, and overall business success. Reputation is more exposed than ever before, while also becoming more intrinsically tied to the integrity of how organisations embody ESG. This again ties back to investor appeal and the long term sustainability of the organisation. 

What are the key questions we need to ask first? 
 
As the world continues to change and evolve, so does the definition of good business practice. By developing ESG strategies and practices, boards and organisations in Australia can build sustainability while contributing positively to its community. 
 
Things to initially consider: 

• Do we know the Environmental, Social and and related Governance trends and issues (ESG) that are affecting our organisation? 
  
• Do we discuss and strategise ways to manage these ESG trends and issues and prevent associated risks within the organisation? 
• Are we proactive in our approaches and strategies in relation to ESG trends and issues and the contribution our organisation could be making externally? i.e., Reconciliation Action Plan, ethical supply chain partnerships (uniforms, equipment) 
• Do we have a designated Board Subcommittee that has oversight of the risk factors and strategies in relation to ESG trends and issues? 
• As a Board are we assured we are doing the right thing for our own workforce in relation to these ESG trends and issues, what do our organisation's retention and turnover rates reflect?